The Sheep, the Goats, and the Dividing Line of Father Abraham: Does Matthew 25:31–46 Teach Salvation by Works of Mercy?

By

Matthew 25:31–46 is one of the most striking—and often misunderstood—passages in the Bible about the final judgment. At first glance, this famous passage about the sheep and the goats appears to suggest that Jesus judges people based on their works. Yet, while this passage certainly affirms the necessity of visible fruit in the lives of believers, it points to something much more foundational. This article examines how the final judgment in Matthew 25:31–46 is grounded in the promises of the Abrahamic covenant, which are fulfilled in Jesus. The judgment is ultimately about one’s identification with Christ and his people, and in this way, loving actions toward his followers serve as real evidence of genuine faith.

Matthew 25:31–46 in Context

The first question we must answer is: Who exactly is being described in Matthew 25:31–46? Who are the nations gathered before the throne (Matt. 25:32a), and who are these sheep and goats (Matt. 25:32b)? Context here is crucial. Matthew 25:31–46 is the climax of Jesus’s teaching about the end of the age. Having instructed his disciples on the signs that will lead up to his second coming (Matt. 24:3–35), Jesus switches gears in 24:36–25:46, urging his disciples to stay alert and ready for that day. This section forms a chiasm:

A: Matthew 24:36–44, Judgment in Noah’s Day & the Son of Man’s Unexpected Coming

B: Matthew 24:45–51, Parable of Faithful and Wicked Servants & their Reward

C: Matthew 25:1–13, Parable of Wise and Foolish Virgins

B1: Matthew 25:14–30, Parable of Faithful and Wicked Servants & their Reward

A1: Matthew 25:31–46 The Son of Man’s Coming & Judgment

The section is bracketed by references to the Son of Man (Matt. 24:37, 39, 44) who comes (Matt. 24:44, cf. 37, 39; 25:31) to judge. Matthew 24:36–44 emphasizes that the Son of Man’s coming will be unexpected for most. It is likened to the days of Noah, where judgment suddenly overcame the people (Matt. 24:37–39). Jesus emphasizes the radical separation that this judgment will bring: “Then two men will be in the field; one will be taken and one left. Two women will be grinding at the mill; one will be taken and one left” (Matt. 24:40–41). Therefore, says Jesus, ensure you are like Noah, ready for the coming judgment (Matt. 24:42–44). This stands across from Jesus’s description of the coming of the Son of Man, in which the solemn separation of the final judgment is described in more detail (Matt. 25:31–46). In between, Jesus tells three parables, each underscoring the need to be ready for that day. The faithful will be separated from the wicked, the wise from the foolish. He will come at an unexpected time and judge. Therefore, one must be ready.

This entire section, then, concerns itself with the same climactic event and must be taken as a unit. It describes the coming of the Son of Man and the judgment that he brings. This judgment is comprehensive: all people (literally “all the nations,” Matt. 25:31; cf. 28:19) are said to be gathered before the glorious throne of the Son of Man (cf. Dan. 7:9–14), the Davidic Shepherd-King (Matt. 25:31–33). This means that the sheep in Matthew 25:31–46 are the same group portrayed earlier as faithful servants, wise virgins, and those who will be saved like Noah. Conversely, the goats are the wicked servants, the foolish virgins, and those who will be left in the Noah-like judgment. This is the final judgment of the living and the dead (Matt. 25:46; cf. Dan. 12:2; Rev. 20:11–15).

A Works-based Judgment?

But this is where things become theologically delicate. At first glance, the final judgment described in Matthew 25:31–46 appears to be based on works. The evidence the King provides for his judgment of the sheep and the goats consists of deeds of mercy and love (Matt. 25:33–40)—or the absence of such deeds (Matt. 25:41–46). Yet we would be mistaken to conclude that these works are the ultimate basis of this judgment.

Throughout Matthew’s Gospel, good works are consistently presented as the fruit of an underlying spiritual reality. Good trees bear good fruit (Matt. 7:17). If good fruit is lacking, the tree is bad (Matt. 7:18; cf. 12:33–37). Likewise, wheat reveals itself in the production of grain, while weeds, by their very nature, cannot (Matt. 13:26). Moreover, Jesus teaches that good fruit is produced because of hearing and receiving the message of the Kingdom (Matt. 13:32), and only those to whom it is given will be able to do so (Matt. 11:25–27; 13:11–12). In short, good works are the visible evidence of a right response to Jesus and his gospel. And as it turns out, this very principle is at play in Matthew 25.

Identification & Representation

But how exactly do these works of mercy function as evidence of a right response to Jesus? After all, Matthew 25:31–46 does not explicitly mention faith in the gospel message, only acts of service. The key lies in Jesus’s explanation: these acts of mercy, although shown towards his followers (who are the little ones, his brothers; see Matthew 25:40, 25:45; cf. 10:42; 18:6, 10; 12:48–50), are rendered as if they were deeds done towards Jesus himself. In other words, the judgment does deal with one’s response to Jesus, but it does so through the principle of identification and representation. This follows a consistent pattern in the First Gospel.

In Matthew 10:32, for example, when Jesus prepares his disciples for their mission of gospel proclamation, he states that those who acknowledge him before men will be acknowledged by him before the Father. Jesus identifies with those who identify with him. Consequently, in Matthew 10:40, those who receive the disciples on their mission are said to receive Jesus and the One who sent him. This reception, then, must be understood as an embracement of the gospel message. They have become disciples of Jesus.

We see something similar in Matthew 18. There, Jesus instructs his disciples on how to order themselves as the community of faith, the church. In Matthew 18:5, Jesus states that the reception of a true believer into the community––that is, a person who has embraced the gospel message by humbling oneself like a child (Matt. 18:3–4)––is akin to receiving Jesus himself. Moreover, the gathered community itself is said to represent Jesus. In Matthew 18:15–20, the decision of the community to discipline unrepentant members is representative of a heavenly judgment. It is done with Jesus’s stamp of approval: in his name and with his delegated authority (Matt. 18:20). The church represents Christ on earth.

The principle, then, is that one’s response to Jesus will be revealed by one’s response to his followers. What is implied is that those who respond positively to Jesus’s followers––bless them, receive them into their homes, and serve them with deeds of love and mercy––are people who have embraced the gospel message proclaimed by Jesus’s representatives. They have joined their community. They are believers and disciples. Their works of service towards the followers of Jesus, then, testify to their embracing of the gospel message. It is the good fruit that serves as evidence that they have embraced Jesus and his message, even though he himself was not physically present. They have aligned themselves with Jesus by aligning themselves with his people and therefore inherit the Kingdom. Matthew 25:31–46, then, depicts not generic philanthropy, but covenantal allegiance expressed through love for Jesus’s representatives.

An Abrahamic Judgment

Approaching Matthew 25:31–46 with this covenantal framework proves crucial for understanding its underlying principles. It reveals that this final judgment scene should be understood as the culmination of the ancient promise made to Abraham in Genesis 12:3: “I will bless those who bless you, and him who dishonors you I will curse, and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.”

Biblical theologian Jim Hamilton aptly captures the weight of this promise:

1. The language of “seed of the woman” and “seed of the serpent” originates in Genesis 3:15, where God declares ongoing enmity between the serpent and the woman, and between their respective offspring. This introduces a central biblical theme: the conflict between the line of those who trust in God and his promises—the line through whom the Messiah would come—and the line of the serpent, made up of those who oppose God and his redemptive purposes. This narrative thread runs throughout Scripture, culminating in the triumph of the Messiah, the ultimate seed of the woman, who will crush the serpent’s head (Gen. 3:15).

God declares that those who refuse to honor Abraham will be cursed the way he cursed the serpent, Cain, and Canaan [Gen. 3:14; 5:11; 9:25]. Moses hereby signals to his audience that, going forward, anyone opposed to Abraham is to be identified as the seed of the serpent, while anyone who aligns with Abraham will be identified as the seed of the woman.[1] When God promises at the end of [Genesis]12:3 that all the families of the earth will be blessed in Abraham, the implication is that the serpent and his seed will be defeated through Abraham and his seed (cf. Gen. 22:17–18), then all aligned with Abraham will experience the blessed peace that results from the triumph of the seed of Abraham, whose descent has been traced in Genesis 5 and 11 all the way back to Adam. The seed of the woman will bless the world through the defeat of the seed of the serpent (Gen. 3:15; 12:1–3; 22:17–18).[2]

2. James M. Hamilton Jr., Typology–Understanding the Bible’s Promise-Shaped Patterns: How Old Testament Expectations are Fulfilled in Christ (Grand Rapids, MI: 2022), 16.

Consider how Matthew engages these promises throughout his Gospel. In the very first verse, Jesus is identified as the promised seed of Abraham, the “Son of Abraham” (Matt. 1:1). The subsequent genealogy confirms this identity by tracing the line of Abraham’s seed, through the royal Davidic lineage, culminating in Jesus (Matt. 1:2–16).

Then, in Matthew 3, the contrast between the seed of Abraham/the woman and the cursed seed of the serpent comes to the fore. John the Baptist calls the Pharisees ‘seed of serpents’ (gennēmata echidnōn; Matt. 3:7) and follows up by questioning their Abrahamic sonship (Matt. 3:9). Indeed, if they do not repent, a judgment of fire awaits them (Matt. 3:10–11). Jesus echoes this charge on two occasions (Matt. 12:34; 23:33), confirming their identity as the serpent’s seed rather than Abraham’s.

This theme is powerfully picked up in the final judgment described in Matthew 25. The sheep are called ‘blessed ones’ (hoi eulogēmenoi; 25:34) whereas the goats are called ‘cursed ones’ (hoi katēramenoi; 25:41)—the exact terms used in the Greek translation of Genesis 12:3 concerning blessing and cursing within the Abrahamic covenant: “I will bless (eulogēsō) those who bless (eulogountas) you, and him who dishonors (katarōmenous) you I will curse (katarasomai), and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed (eneulogēthēsontai).”

Furthermore, the destinies of the sheep and goats in Matthew 25 correspond precisely to the themes of blessing and curse in Genesis. The cursed will undergo the same judgment as the devil and his angels: fire (Gen. 25:41; cf. 3:10–11). The blessed, in contrast, inherit the Kingdom. The Greek word translated as ‘inherit’ (klēronomēsate) carries significant weight in the context of the Abrahamic covenant, repeatedly used concerning the land promise (Gen. 15:3–8; 21:10; cf. 22:17). Interestingly, Matthew employs this term only three times—referring to inheriting the land (Matt. 5:5), eternal life (Matt. 19:29), and the Kingdom (Matt. 25:31). Together, these terms depict the full realization of the Abrahamic promises in the new heavens and the new earth. Whereas the goats receive the curse of their father, the devil, the sheep receive the blessing that was promised to Abraham.

In summary, in Matthew’s Gospel, Jesus is the promised singular seed of Abraham (cf. Gal. 3:16). Those who identify with him are regarded as Abraham’s seed by virtue of their relationship to Christ (see Matt. 12:48–50; cf. Gal. 3:29). Therefore, bless Jesus’s disciples and you will be blessed; curse them and you will be cursed. As we have seen, this act of blessing must be understood in a comprehensive sense. It is fully aligning oneself with Jesus by embracing the gospel message (believing!), and this is evidenced by deeds of love and mercy toward his people.

The Ultimate Basis for Blessing

As the remainder of Matthew’s Gospel demonstrates, the ultimate basis on which Jesus can bless the sheep is that he saves them from their sins (Matt. 1:21; 26:27–29). He accomplishes this by becoming a curse for them on the cross. As Paul interprets for us: “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us—for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who is hanged on a tree”—so that in Christ Jesus the blessing of Abraham might come to the Gentiles” (Gal. 3:13–14). Jesus lifted the curse by becoming a curse, and in doing so, became the source of Abrahamic blessing to all who would bless the Abrahamic Son (see Gen. 12:1–3; cf. 22:17–18). This is the profound reality depicted in Matthew 25:31–46.

Conclusion

Matthew 25:31–46 reveals that the final judgment is rooted in the covenantal promise made to Abraham, fulfilled in Jesus as the promised Seed. Those who embrace the gospel and align themselves with Jesus and his followers receive the blessing of Abraham, while those who reject him are cursed. The judgment is not ultimately based on works, but on one’s identification with Christ and his people. The acts of love and mercy toward his followers serve as tangible evidence of this (cf., 1 John 4:20–21). It is “faith working through love” (Gal. 5:6).

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Author

  • Laurens Pruis is the Preaching Pastor at Gereformeerde Baptistengemeente Rotterdam-Zuid (Reformed Baptist Church of South Rotterdam). He earned an M.Div. from The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and was sent out by Kenwood Baptist Church to plant a church in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, his home country. He is also a Ph.D. candidate in Biblical Studies at SBTS.

    View all posts
Picture of Laurens H. E. Pruis

Laurens H. E. Pruis

Laurens Pruis is the Preaching Pastor at Gereformeerde Baptistengemeente Rotterdam-Zuid (Reformed Baptist Church of South Rotterdam). He earned an M.Div. from The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and was sent out by Kenwood Baptist Church to plant a church in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, his home country. He is also a Ph.D. candidate in Biblical Studies at SBTS.